Liendo v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liendo v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center

273 A.D.2d 445, 711 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 445 (Liendo v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liendo v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 273 A.D.2d 445, 711 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for mental anguish arising from the mishandling of a corpse, the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated July 9, 1999, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) to include a claim for punitive damages against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint to include a claim for punitive damages against the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center (see, Aponte v Brentwood Union Free School Dist., 270 AD2d 295; Cardozo v Midway Motor Hotel, 251 AD2d 442; Everything Discount v Graham Raflico Assocs., 202 AD2d 389). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for mental anguish arising from the mishandling of a corpse, the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated July 9, 1999, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) to include a claim for punitive damages against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint to include a claim for punitive damages against the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center (see, Aponte v Brentwood Union Free School Dist., 270 AD2d 295; Cardozo v Midway Motor Hotel, 251 AD2d 442; Everything Discount v Graham Raflico Assocs., 202 AD2d 389). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 445, 711 N.Y.S.2d 741, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liendo-v-long-island-jewish-medical-center-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack