Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-418-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
LIEM THAN LE AND PHUNG THAN, Appellants,
v.
ROBERT G. TAYLOR II, ET AL., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 343rd District Court
of Aransas County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, LIEM THAN LE AND PHUNG THAN, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 343rd District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-03-0281-CV-C. After the record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 24th day of March, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury (Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.