Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 24, 2005·No. 13-04-00418-CV·Published

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-418-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

LIEM THAN LE AND PHUNG THAN,                                   Appellants,


v.


ROBERT G. TAYLOR II, ET AL.,                                          Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 343rd District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, LIEM THAN LE AND PHUNG THAN, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 343rd District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-03-0281-CV-C. After the record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 24th day of March, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury (Liem Than Le and Phung Than v. Robert G. Taylor, II, Cletus P. Ernster, Jr., and Samuel S. Canterbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.