Liekens v. De Maria
This text of 8 A.D.2d 854 (Liekens v. De Maria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover money fraudulently converted, and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as granted respondent’s motion to the extent of deleting from a judgment a provision for execution against the person. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Arnold v. National Plastikwear Fashions, 6 A D 2d 411.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 854, 191 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liekens-v-de-maria-nyappdiv-1959.