Liedel v. State

549 So. 2d 1351, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 223, 1989 WL 76712
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 13, 1989
DocketCiv. 6940
StatusPublished

This text of 549 So. 2d 1351 (Liedel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liedel v. State, 549 So. 2d 1351, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 223, 1989 WL 76712 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The parties and the subject matter in this appeal have previously been before this court in Ex Parte Liedel, 534 So.2d 624 (Ala.Civ.App.1988).

Mr. Liedel (who is the only appellant here) references three orders of the juvenile court in his Statement of the Case. Our conclusion is that neither the February 10, 1989, nor the February 22, 1989, order was an appealable order. As to the February 24, 1989, order finding Mr. Liedel in wilful contempt of that court’s January 28, 1988 order, no notice of appeal was filed.

We therefore conclude that no appealable order or judgment is properly before this court in this case. See: Code of Alabama 1975, § 12-15-120; § 12-12-70; § 12-22-2, and A.R.Civ.P.Rule 54. Also see Swann v. Stovall, 506 So.2d 1017 (Ala.Civ.App.1987). This appeal is hereby dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

INGRAM, P.J., and RUSSELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swann v. Stovall
506 So. 2d 1017 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Ex parte Liedel
534 So. 2d 624 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 So. 2d 1351, 1989 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 223, 1989 WL 76712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liedel-v-state-alacivapp-1989.