Liebschutz v. Schaffer Stores Co.

274 A.D. 847, 80 N.Y.S.2d 771
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Upon this record, plaintiff was entitled only to an election to accept the plan of a reclassification of the shares of the capital stock or to seek an appraisal pursuant to section 21 of the Stock Corporation Law. On an appraisal, his rights, if any, to the surplus would have been determined. Plaintiff took neither step. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, (Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp., 295 N. Y. 343; McNulty v. W. & J. Sloane, 184 Misc. 835.) All concur, (The order denies defendant’s [848] motion for summary judgment and for dismissal of the complaint.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See post, pp. 870, 1023.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liebschutz v. Schaffer Stores Co., 274 A.D. 847, 80 N.Y.S.2d 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 847 (Liebschutz v. Schaffer Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. Pepin Pickling Co.
41 N.W.2d 571 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)