Liebowitz v. H & W Realty Corp.

21 Misc. 2d 258, 199 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2495
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 2d 258 (Liebowitz v. H & W Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liebowitz v. H & W Realty Corp., 21 Misc. 2d 258, 199 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The agreed statement of facts fails to disclose the nature or extent of the physical changes, if any, which were made when the apartment was converted from housing to non-housing use and when it was subsequently reconverted to housing use. In the absence of such proof it cannot be determined whether the housing accommodations were exempt from rent control for the period here involved. (See Matter of Lord Management Corp. v. Weaver, 8 A D 2d 943; Matter of Eckert v. McGoldrick, 284 App. Div. 810.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendant to abide the event.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eckert v. McGoldrick
284 A.D. 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Misc. 2d 258, 199 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liebowitz-v-h-w-realty-corp-nyappterm-1959.