Liebmann v. Liebmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liebmann v. Liebmann

22 A.D.2d 663, 253 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3009

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 663 (Liebmann v. Liebmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liebmann v. Liebmann, 22 A.D.2d 663, 253 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

[664]*664Order and judgment awarding the plaintiff wife alimony and support in the sum of $15,500 per year, annual maintenance of $7,000 for the child of the marriage and a fee of $12,500 to plaintiff’s counsel, modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of eliminating the retroactive provisions and reducing the counsel fee to $7,500, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. There is a sufficient showing of change of circumstances since the award on stipulation in the separation action but it cannot be determined with any degree of certainty on this record when they materialized to the extent of warranting a retroactive award. (See Liebmann v. Liebmann, 19 A D 2d 821; 18 A D 2d 798; 18 A D 2d 611.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[664]*664Order and judgment awarding the plaintiff wife alimony and support in the sum of $15,500 per year, annual maintenance of $7,000 for the child of the marriage and a fee of $12,500 to plaintiff’s counsel, modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of eliminating the retroactive provisions and reducing the counsel fee to $7,500, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. There is a sufficient showing of change of circumstances since the award on stipulation in the separation action but it cannot be determined with any degree of certainty on this record when they materialized to the extent of warranting a retroactive award. (See Liebmann v. Liebmann, 19 A D 2d 821; 18 A D 2d 798; 18 A D 2d 611.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 663, 253 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liebmann-v-liebmann-nyappdiv-1964.