Liebman v. Town of Jamaica

485 A.2d 138, 145 Vt. 659, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 557
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 9, 1984·No. No. 82-345·Published

Opinion

Because the findings issued by the Property Valuation and Review Division are inadequate, this ease must be reversed and remanded. See Corrette v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 140 Vt. 315, 437 A.2d 1112 (1981) ; Schweizer v. Town of Pomfret, 134 Vt. 436, 365 A.2d 134 (1976); Bookstaver v. Town of Westminster, 131 Vt. 133, 300 A.2d 891 (1973).

“The Board has an affirmative duty to make specific findings [of fact regarding] the comparable properties. It is clearly insufficient and constitutes reversible error to merely state, as it did, that it ‘checked’ the comparable properties.” Schweizer, supra, 134 Vt. at 437, 365 A.2d at 135.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liebman v. Town of Jamaica, 485 A.2d 138, 145 Vt. 659, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 557 (Vt. 1984).

485 A.2d 138 (Liebman v. Town of Jamaica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schweizer v. Town of Pomfret
365 A.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1976)
Corrette v. Town of St. Johnsbury
437 A.2d 1112 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1981)
Bookstaver v. Town of Westminster
300 A.2d 891 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1973)