Liebman v. Town of Jamaica
This text of 485 A.2d 138 (Liebman v. Town of Jamaica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the findings issued by the Property Valuation and Review Division are inadequate, this ease must be reversed and remanded. See Corrette v. Town of St. Johnsbury, 140 Vt. 315, 437 A.2d 1112 (1981) ; Schweizer v. Town of Pomfret, 134 Vt. 436, 365 A.2d 134 (1976); Bookstaver v. Town of Westminster, 131 Vt. 133, 300 A.2d 891 (1973).
“The Board has an affirmative duty to make specific findings [of fact regarding] the comparable properties. It is clearly insufficient and constitutes reversible error to merely state, as it did, that it ‘checked’ the comparable properties.” Schweizer, supra, 134 Vt. at 437, 365 A.2d at 135.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 A.2d 138, 145 Vt. 659, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liebman-v-town-of-jamaica-vt-1984.