Liebman v. Liebman

565 So. 2d 895, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6400, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1990·No. No. 89-2046·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s final judgment in all respects except one. We reverse that portion of the final judgment that awards the former husband full credit for all mortgage payments, insurance, taxes and repairs made by him on the marital home. We remand to the trial court with directions to amend the final judgment to reflect that the former husband is entitled, upon sale of the marital home, to credit for one-half the amounts expended. See Danoff v. Danoff, 501 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

DELL, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liebman v. Liebman, 565 So. 2d 895, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6400, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

565 So. 2d 895 (Liebman v. Liebman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danoff v. Danoff
501 So. 2d 1361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)