Liebermann Waelchli & Co. N.Y., Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Liebermann Waelchli & Co. N.Y., Inc. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 309, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2181

United States Customs Court·Decided January 26, 1965·No. No. 69040; protests 60/6242, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation -of counsel that the merchandise consists of battery-operated egg beaters which contain as an essential feature an electrical element or device and that the issue involved herein (i.e., relative specificity) is the same in all material respects as that involved in United States v. Electrolux Corporation (46 CCPA 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation -of counsel that the merchandise consists of battery-operated egg beaters which contain as an essential feature an electrical element or device and that the issue involved herein (i.e., relative specificity) is the same in all material respects as that involved in United States v. Electrolux Corporation (46 CCPA 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Liebermann Waelchli & Co. N.Y., Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 309, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2181 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

54 Cust. Ct. 309 (Liebermann Waelchli & Co. N.Y., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.