Lieberman v. Stein

2 A.D.2d 893, 156 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883

This text of 2 A.D.2d 893 (Lieberman v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lieberman v. Stein, 2 A.D.2d 893, 156 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

In an action on contract to recover liquidated damages, the appeal is from so much of an order as denies a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The making of the demand on the surety company on February 21, 1955 and appellant’s failure to pay the money into court until on or about April 4, 1955 are conceded. The tender and the payment into court constitute an affirmative defense which should have been pleaded to render evidence thereof admissible (Civ. Prac. Act, § 174-a). Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 893, 156 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lieberman-v-stein-nyappdiv-1956.