Lieberman v. Hoffman

2 Pennyp. 211
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 20, 1882·No. No. 290·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

This case is ruled by Brenner v. Moyer, 10 W. N. C., 565, in which it was decided that proceedings under the Act of March 17th; 1869, Pamph. L., 8, are to be regarded as a mere personal action. The attachment is to secure a lien, and depends upon the recovery of a final personal judgment. It follows that the rulings of [214] the learned judge in the Court below were right, and that the prior judgment for the same cause of action was a bar.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lieberman v. Hoffman, 2 Pennyp. 211 (Pa. 1882).

2 Pennyp. 211 (Lieberman v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Posner v. Sheridan
299 A.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
General Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp.
104 A.2d 505 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Miller v. Rohrer
18 A. 2 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)