Lieberman v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Lieberman v. Hoffman

2 Pennyp. 211

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 20, 1882

DocketNo. 290

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 Pennyp. 211 (Lieberman v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lieberman v. Hoffman, 2 Pennyp. 211 (Pa. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

This case is ruled by Brenner v. Moyer, 10 W. N. C., 565, in which it was decided that proceedings under the Act of March 17th; 1869, Pamph. L., 8, are to be regarded as a mere personal action. The attachment is to secure a lien, and depends upon the recovery of a final personal judgment. It follows that the rulings of [214]*214the learned judge in the Court below were right, and that the prior judgment for the same cause of action was a bar.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam:

This case is ruled by Brenner v. Moyer, 10 W. N. C., 565, in which it was decided that proceedings under the Act of March 17th; 1869, Pamph. L., 8, are to be regarded as a mere personal action. The attachment is to secure a lien, and depends upon the recovery of a final personal judgment. It follows that the rulings of [214]*214the learned judge in the Court below were right, and that the prior judgment for the same cause of action was a bar.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pennyp. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lieberman-v-hoffman-pa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack