Lidsky v. Bragarnick
This text of 53 Misc. 2d 649 (Lidsky v. Bragarnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this nonpayment summary proceeding, covering decontrolled premises, landlords seek increased rent based on tenant’s continued occupancy after his lease expired, in accordance with a notice served. The effect of such notice and continued occupancy thereunder created a new agreement (St. James Apts. v. Finke, 181 N. Y. S. 356; 463 Realty Corp. v. Moloff, 62 N. Y. S. 2d 83; Kaufman v. Bartels, 182 Misc. 128). The jury waiver clause in the expired lease did not carry over into the new tenancy.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.
Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Hopstadter and Hecht, Jr., JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Misc. 2d 649, 279 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lidsky-v-bragarnick-nyappterm-1967.