Lidsky v. Bragarnick

53 Misc. 2d 649, 279 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1652
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 30, 1967·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this nonpayment summary proceeding, covering decontrolled premises, landlords seek increased rent based on tenant’s continued occupancy after his lease expired, in accordance with a notice served. The effect of such notice and continued occupancy thereunder created a new agreement (St. James Apts. v. Finke, 181 N. Y. S. 356; 463 Realty Corp. v. Moloff, 62 N. Y. S. 2d 83; Kaufman v. Bartels, 182 Misc. 128). The jury waiver clause in the expired lease did not carry over into the new tenancy.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Hopstadter and Hecht, Jr., JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lidsky v. Bragarnick, 53 Misc. 2d 649, 279 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

53 Misc. 2d 649 (Lidsky v. Bragarnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaufman v. Bartels
182 Misc. 128 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)