Lido Spa Hotel v. Newman

Supreme Court of Florida

Lido Spa Hotel v. Newman

187 So. 2d 334, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3698

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1966

DocketNo. 34801

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 334 (Lido Spa Hotel v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lido Spa Hotel v. Newman, 187 So. 2d 334, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3698 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

[335]*335Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI