Lidia Funez-Avilez v. Jefferson Sessions III

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2018
Docket17-1921
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lidia Funez-Avilez v. Jefferson Sessions III (Lidia Funez-Avilez v. Jefferson Sessions III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lidia Funez-Avilez v. Jefferson Sessions III, (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1921

LIDIA FUNEZ-AVILEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 20, 2018 Decided: March 28, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Steven K. Uejio, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lidia Funez-Avilez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the

Immigration Judge’s denial of her request for protection under the Convention Against

Torture. After thoroughly reviewing the record and Funez-Avilez’s claims, we conclude

that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See Dankam v. Gonzales, 495

F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2), (3) (2017). Accordingly, we

deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Funez-Avilez

(B.I.A. July 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dankam v. Gonzales
495 F.3d 113 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lidia Funez-Avilez v. Jefferson Sessions III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lidia-funez-avilez-v-jefferson-sessions-iii-ca4-2018.