Lidia Araica-Granados v. Eric Holder, Jr.

436 F. App'x 817
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2011
Docket09-73227
StatusUnpublished

This text of 436 F. App'x 817 (Lidia Araica-Granados v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lidia Araica-Granados v. Eric Holder, Jr., 436 F. App'x 817 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lidia Araica-Granados, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen and to reconsider. We dismiss the petition for review.

Araica-Granados contends that she is prima facie eligible for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i) because her removal would cause extreme hardship to her United States citizen spouse. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Nath v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 1185, 1188 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nath v. Gonzales
467 F.3d 1185 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F. App'x 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lidia-araica-granados-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.