Liddon v. Crawfordville State Bank

60 Fla. 115
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been duly considered .by the court, and Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Hocker and Mr. Justice Parkhill being of opinion that [116]*116the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla., 224, 37 South. Rep., 51, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liddon v. Crawfordville State Bank, 60 Fla. 115 (Fla. 1910).

60 Fla. 115 (Liddon v. Crawfordville State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)