Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v. Personal Serv. Ins. Co.

75 Misc. 3d 138(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2022
Docket2020-174 K C
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 Misc. 3d 138(A) (Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v. Personal Serv. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v. Personal Serv. Ins. Co., 75 Misc. 3d 138(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v Personal Serv. Ins. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U)) [*1]

Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v Personal Serv. Ins. Co.
2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U) [75 Misc 3d 138(A)]
Decided on June 10, 2022
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on June 10, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2020-174 K C

Lida's Medical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Pettie, Timothy, Respondent,

against

Personal Service Insurance Company, Appellant.


Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Oleg Rybak of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Cenceria P. Edwards, J.), entered March 13, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the affidavit of service alleges that the summons and complaint were served by mail pursuant to CPLR 312-a. However, plaintiff's papers do not contain an acknowledgment of service. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to obtain personal jurisdiction over defendant. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. Defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court entered March 13, 2019 as denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v American Ind. Ins. Co. (69 Misc 3d 127[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 51118[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]), the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, and defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted.

ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 10, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.
75 Misc. 3d 138(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Mega Aid Pharm. I, Inc. v. A. Cent. Ins. Co.
75 Misc. 3d 138(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Misc. 3d 138(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lidas-med-supply-inc-v-personal-serv-ins-co-nyappterm-2022.