Licor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Licor v. State

767 So. 2d 680, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13531, 2000 WL 1531818

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 18, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-2213

StatusPublished

This text of 767 So. 2d 680 (Licor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Licor v. State, 767 So. 2d 680, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13531, 2000 WL 1531818 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing under the 1994 guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). In the alternative, the State “should have the opportunity to withdraw from the plea agreement, reinstate the dismissed charge, and proceed to trial on all counts.” Gault v. State, 762 So.2d 578, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing under the 1994 guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). In the alternative, the State “should have the opportunity to withdraw from the plea agreement, reinstate the dismissed charge, and proceed to trial on all counts.” Gault v. State, 762 So.2d 578, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 So. 2d 680, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13531, 2000 WL 1531818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/licor-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack