Lickerman v. Motchan
This text of 82 Misc. 405 (Lickerman v. Motchan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint states a cause of action, and demands judgment for $5,000. The defendant demurred “ on the ground that the jurisdiction of the court is limited to actions where the sum claimed does not exceed $2,000, and that it appears upon the face of the amended complaint herein that the sum demanded in damages is the sum of $5,000. ’ ’ The court below properly overruled the demurrer. It has been uniformly held that the City Court has jurisdiction of an action wherein the complaint demands judgment for a greater sum than $2,000 with interest and costs, although a judgment for a sum in excess of that amount cannot be entered. Ralli v. Pearsall, 69 App. Div. 254. The case of Lewkowicz v. Queen Aeroplane Co., 154 App. Div. 142; 207 N. Y. 290, has in no way changed this rule.
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within six days after service of a copy of the order entered herewith, with notice of entry in the City Court upon payment of costs in this court and the court below.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Misc. 405, 143 N.Y.S. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lickerman-v-motchan-nyappterm-1913.