Lichtman v. Mount Judah Cemetery

2 A.D.3d 354, 768 N.Y.S.2d 826, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14043

This text of 2 A.D.3d 354 (Lichtman v. Mount Judah Cemetery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lichtman v. Mount Judah Cemetery, 2 A.D.3d 354, 768 N.Y.S.2d 826, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J), entered November 8, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion to restore the case to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This case was initially dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders for discovery and the filing of a note of issue, rather than for abandonment of prosecution (cf. Johnson v Minskoff & Sons, 287 AD2d 233 [2001]). In rejecting prior efforts to restore the case to the calendar, this Court has noted the absence of merit to plaintiffs claims (269 AD2d 319 [2000], lv denied in part and dismissed in part 95 NY2d 860 [2000]; 283 AD2d 333 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 638 [2001]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find [355]*355them to be without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Sam Minskoff & Sons, Inc.
287 A.D.2d 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.3d 354, 768 N.Y.S.2d 826, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtman-v-mount-judah-cemetery-nyappdiv-2003.