Lichtman v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lichtman v. Board of Elections

33 A.D.2d 1049, 308 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1049 (Lichtman v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lichtman v. Board of Elections, 33 A.D.2d 1049, 308 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR in the nature of mandamus to compel (1) the Board of Elections of .the County of Nassau to furnish a certificate of election to petitioner certifying him as the regularly elected Committeeman of the Democratic Party, 16th Election District, 11th Assembly 'District, Town of Hempstead, and (2) the Nassau County Democratic Committee to designate him as such regularly elected Committeeman, said Board of Elections and said Democratic Committee appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 28, 1969, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the challenge to petitioner’s enrollment subsequent to his election and nomination on Primary Day was untimely (Matter of Reich v. Bosco, 21 Misc 2d 973, 977, affd. 9 A D 2d 919; Matter of Buechel v. Bosco, 9 A D 2d 916). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR in the nature of mandamus to compel (1) the Board of Elections of .the County of Nassau to furnish a certificate of election to petitioner certifying him as the regularly elected Committeeman of the Democratic Party, 16th Election District, 11th Assembly 'District, Town of Hempstead, and (2) the Nassau County Democratic Committee to designate him as such regularly elected Committeeman, said Board of Elections and said Democratic Committee appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 28, 1969, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the challenge to petitioner’s enrollment subsequent to his election and nomination on Primary Day was untimely (Matter of Reich v. Bosco, 21 Misc 2d 973, 977, affd. 9 A D 2d 919; Matter of Buechel v. Bosco, 9 A D 2d 916). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1049, 308 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtman-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack