Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R.
This text of Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R. (Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 48 EAL 2016 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : ROBERT WALTON, KENNETH : VENNERA, THOMAS HEIMBACH, : ROBERT KRANDEL, DAVID STECKEL, : RICHARD STEVENS, PAUL BARTLE, : RONALD BLUESTEIN, JENNY BROWN, : CHRISTOPHER CURCI, EMMETT : FITZPATRICK, MATT FOLEY AND : RICHARD GREENSTEIN, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and
Motion to Add Supplemental Statement are DENIED.
Justices Donohue and Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or
decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtman-j-v-walton-r-pa-2016.