Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 29, 2016·No. 48 EAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 48 EAL 2016 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

ROBERT WALTON, KENNETH : VENNERA, THOMAS HEIMBACH, : ROBERT KRANDEL, DAVID STECKEL, : RICHARD STEVENS, PAUL BARTLE, : RONALD BLUESTEIN, JENNY BROWN, : CHRISTOPHER CURCI, EMMETT : FITZPATRICK, MATT FOLEY AND : RICHARD GREENSTEIN, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and

Motion to Add Supplemental Statement are DENIED.

Justices Donohue and Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or

decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R., (Pa. 2016).

Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R. (Lichtman, J. v. Walton, R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.