Lichtman, J. v. Hersh, E.
This text of Lichtman, J. v. Hersh, E. (Lichtman, J. v. Hersh, E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JOAN LICHTMAN, : No. 167 EAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : ELIZABETH HERSH, SANDRA VASKO, : SERGE LEVIN, ANN RUDNICK, JOYCE : SACCO, MARY SCULLION, CAROL : THOMAS, BRIGID TOMS, JONATHAN : JUCKETT, LINDA DONOVAN-MAGDAMO, : NICOLE SUMMERVILLE, CURTIS : JORDAN, EDWARD FARRINGTON, : DANIEL FEINBERG, M.D., JANEL DAVIS, : AND GINA GENTILE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
and the Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lichtman, J. v. Hersh, E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtman-j-v-hersh-e-pa-2022.