Lichti v. State

835 N.E.2d 478, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 671, 2005 WL 2660172
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 19, 2005
Docket79S05-0507-CR-325
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 835 N.E.2d 478 (Lichti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lichti v. State, 835 N.E.2d 478, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 671, 2005 WL 2660172 (Ind. 2005).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER AND REMANDING TO TRIAL COURT

Following a jury trial, Lloyd Lichti ("Lichti") was found guilty of Felony Murder, Kidnapping as a Class A felony, Criminal Confinement as a Class B felony, Robbery as a Class C felony, and Theft as a Class D felony. The trial court sentenced Lichti to enhanced terms 1 of sixty-five years on the Felony Murder conviction and eight years on the Robbery conviction, to run consecutively. The trial court did not enter judgment or sentence on the remaining verdicts due to double jeopardy concerns.

The trial court found the following aggravating factors justified enhancement of Lichti's sentences: (1) the risk Lichti would commit another crime; (2) the nature and cireumstances of the crime; (8) the victim being over 65 years of age; and (4) the victim's family's desire that Lichti receive an enhanced sentence. Lichti appealed both his convictions and his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Lichti v. State, 827 N.E.2d 82 (Ind.Ct.App. 2005).

This matter is presently before this Court on a petition to transfer jurisdiction filed by the Appellant pursuant to Appellate Rule 57. Upon review we find Lichti's enhanced sentences cannot be sustained in light of our recent decisions interpreting and applying Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). See, e.g., Smylie v. State, 823 N.E.2d 679 (Ind.2005); Patrick v. State, 827 N.E.2d 30 (Ind.2005) (per curiam); Wright v. State, 829 N.E.2d 928 (Ind., 2005) Mask v. State, 829 N.E.2d 932 (Ind., 2005). Accordingly, we GRANT the Appellant's transfer petition and REMAND this case to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing at which the State may elect to prove adequate aggravating cireumstances before a jury or stipulate to Lichti being sentenced to consecutive statutory fixed terms on the Felony Murder and Class C Robbery convictions. See Smylie, 823 N.E.2d at 691.

Except for Part V(A) and any reference to the trial court's weighing of aggravating and mitigating cireumstances, we SUMMARILY AFFIRM the Court of Appeals' opinion. Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A). Except for the resentencing required by this Order, the trial court is AFFIRMED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Chief Judge James Kirsch of the Indiana Court of Appeals; to Judges John Baker and Michael Barnes, Indiana Court of Appeals; to Steve Lancaster, Indiana Court of Appeals Administrator; to Judge Thomas H. Busch, Tippecance Superior Court; the Clerk of the Tippecanoe Superior Court; to all counsel of ree-ord; and to West Publishing Company for publication in its advance sheets and the bound volumes of this Court's official reporter.

All justices concur.
1

. The presumptive sentence for Felony Murder is fifty-five years, with a maximum of ten years added for aggravating circumstances. Ind.Code § 35-50-2-3. The presumptive sentence for a Class C felony is 4 years, with a maximum of 4 years added for aggravating circumstances. Ind.Code § 35-50-2-6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anthony P. Sharp, Jr. v. State of Indiana
16 N.E.3d 470 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 N.E.2d 478, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 671, 2005 WL 2660172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichti-v-state-ind-2005.