Lichtenthal v. Swormville Fire Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lichtenthal v. Swormville Fire Co.

166 A.D.2d 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1990

DocketAppeal No. 6

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D.2d 877 (Lichtenthal v. Swormville Fire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lichtenthal v. Swormville Fire Co., 166 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church ([appeal No. 2] 166 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]).

All concur, except Balio and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the same dissenting memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church, ([appeal No. 3] 166 AD2d 875 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church ([appeal No. 2] 166 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]).

All concur, except Balio and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the same dissenting memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church, ([appeal No. 3] 166 AD2d 875 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtenthal-v-swormville-fire-co-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack