Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church
166 A.D.2d 877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 873 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·No. Appeal No. 5·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church ([appeal No. 2] 166 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]).
All concur, except Balio and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the same dissenting memorandum as in Lichtenthal v St. Mary’s Church ([appeal No. 3] 166 AD2d 875 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church, 166 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
166 A.D.2d 877 (Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church
166 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church
166 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)