Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lichtenstein v. Rabolinski

Lichtenstein v. Rabolinski

75 N.Y.S. 1128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lichtenstein v. Rabolinski. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 N.Y.S. 615 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1902·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, but without prejudice to the right to renew the motion at the opening of the next term of this court, in case of failure to exercise due diligence in procuring the case and exceptions herein to be settled and filed, and the printed papers filed and served.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lichtenstein v. Rabolinski, 75 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

75 N.Y.S. 1128 (Lichtenstein v. Rabolinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.