Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto

198 A.D.2d 51, 604 N.Y.S.2d 727

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 1993·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.), entered May 13, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for a protective order, to the extent of striking item 15 and modifying item 14 of plaintiff’s interrogatories, and which directed defendant-appellant to answer the balance of plaintiff’s interrogatories within 30 days from the date of the order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s balanced disposition. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Rubin and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.), entered May 13, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for a protective order, to the extent of striking item 15 and modifying item 14 of plaintiff’s interrogatories, and which directed defendant-appellant to answer the balance of plaintiff’s interrogatories within 30 days from the date of the order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s balanced disposition. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Rubin and Kassal, JJ.

Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto, 198 A.D.2d 51, 604 N.Y.S.2d 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 51 (Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.