Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto

198 A.D.2d 51, 604 N.Y.S.2d 727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 51 (Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lichtenstein v. Polizzotto, 198 A.D.2d 51, 604 N.Y.S.2d 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.), entered May 13, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for a protective order, to the extent of striking item 15 and modifying item 14 of plaintiff’s interrogatories, and which directed defendant-appellant to answer the balance of plaintiff’s interrogatories within 30 days from the date of the order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s balanced disposition. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Rubin and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.), entered May 13, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for a protective order, to the extent of striking item 15 and modifying item 14 of plaintiff’s interrogatories, and which directed defendant-appellant to answer the balance of plaintiff’s interrogatories within 30 days from the date of the order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s balanced disposition. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Rubin and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 51, 604 N.Y.S.2d 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtenstein-v-polizzotto-nyappdiv-1993.