Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein
This text of 6 Misc. 629 (Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for the examination of the plaintiff before trial. The papers used on the motion present a proper case for the exercise of judicial discretion. In the absence of abuse in the use of this discretion we cannot interfere. There was none here, and the order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Eewburgbr, J., concurs.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Misc. 629, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lichtenstein-v-lichtenstein-nynyccityct-1894.