Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein

6 Misc. 629, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 903
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided January 15, 1894·Published

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for the examination of the plaintiff before trial. The papers used on the motion present a proper case for the exercise of judicial discretion. In the absence of abuse in the use of this discretion we cannot interfere. There was none here, and the order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Eewburgbr, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein, 6 Misc. 629, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 903 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

6 Misc. 629 (Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.