Lichentag v. Feitel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lichentag v. Feitel

2 Teiss. 7, 1904 La. App. LEXIS 92

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 16, 1904

DocketNo. 3473

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Teiss. 7 (Lichentag v. Feitel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lichentag v. Feitel, 2 Teiss. 7, 1904 La. App. LEXIS 92 (La. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

DUFOUR, J.

The present appellants were appellees in suit No. 322!, recently decided, and that decision exhausted our ap-pelate jurisdiction in the premises.

No review cafl now he had of a judgment, which could have been had on the first appeal, either by motion to amend or be becoming appellants.

Arts. 888-889 C. P.

42 An. 441, 48 A. 351, 105 La. 309.

The first decision concludes both appellants and appellees,

Tire motion to dismiss must prevail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI