Lichentag v. Feitel
2 Teiss. 7, 1904 La. App. LEXIS 92
Opinion
The present appellants were appellees in suit No. 322!, recently decided, and that decision exhausted our ap-pelate jurisdiction in the premises.
No review cafl now he had of a judgment, which could have been had on the first appeal, either by motion to amend or be becoming appellants.
Arts. 888-889 C. P.
42 An. 441, 48 A. 351, 105 La. 309.
The first decision concludes both appellants and appellees,
Tire motion to dismiss must prevail.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lichentag v. Feitel, 2 Teiss. 7, 1904 La. App. LEXIS 92 (La. Ct. App. 1904).
2 Teiss. 7 (Lichentag v. Feitel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Heintz v. Judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
105 La. 309 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1901)