Licette Music Corp. v. A.A. Records, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Licette Music Corp. v. A.A. Records, Inc.

239 A.D.2d 228, 657 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D.2d 228 (Licette Music Corp. v. A.A. Records, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Licette Music Corp. v. A.A. Records, Inc., 239 A.D.2d 228, 657 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), entered October 25, 1995, which denied defendants’ motion to confirm that the judgment entered against them by the same court and Justice on May 22, 1992 is in the total amount of $4,948,855.27 rather than $9,502,197.69, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The judgment sufficiently delineated between the separate monetary awards for the breach of contract and tort causes of action. Our subsequent affirmance of the tort portion of the award (196 AD2d 467, lv denied 82 NY2d 662) left undisturbed the breach of contract award, because defendants themselves had so limited the scope of that appeal. The judgment plaintiffs have docketed in New Jersey is consistent with the judgment of the trial court. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), entered October 25, 1995, which denied defendants’ motion to confirm that the judgment entered against them by the same court and Justice on May 22, 1992 is in the total amount of $4,948,855.27 rather than $9,502,197.69, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The judgment sufficiently delineated between the separate monetary awards for the breach of contract and tort causes of action. Our subsequent affirmance of the tort portion of the award (196 AD2d 467, lv denied 82 NY2d 662) left undisturbed the breach of contract award, because defendants themselves had so limited the scope of that appeal. The judgment plaintiffs have docketed in New Jersey is consistent with the judgment of the trial court. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 228, 657 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/licette-music-corp-v-aa-records-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack