Liccione ex rel. Alguire v. Hartman
This text of 107 A.D.2d 1079 (Liccione ex rel. Alguire v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner failed to establish paternity “by ‘clear and convincing’ evidence, evidence which is ‘entirely satisfactory’ and creates a genuine belief that respondent is the father of the child (Matter of Lopez v Sanchez, 34 NY2d 662; Matter of Piccola v Hibbard, 51 AD2d 674, affd 40 NY2d 1035; Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. [McNamee] v Ryan, 238 App Div 607, 608, supra)” (Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip DeG., 59 NY2d 137, 141-142). (Appeal from order of Oneida County Family Court, Bersani, J. — paternity.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Denman and Green, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.2d 1079, 486 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liccione-ex-rel-alguire-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1985.