Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

248 A.D. 731

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. Although there was a verdict for defendant, it clearly appears defendant offered no proof in contradiction of the claims of plaintiffs. The testimony in support of plaintiffs’ ease seemed to be truthful and convincing. There was nothing suspicious or unusual about the accident and the attendant circumstances. There was ample warrant for the order. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. Although there was a verdict for defendant, it clearly appears defendant offered no proof in contradiction of the claims of plaintiffs. The testimony in support of plaintiffs’ ease seemed to be truthful and convincing. There was nothing suspicious or unusual about the accident and the attendant circumstances. There was ample warrant for the order. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 248 A.D. 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 731 (Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.