Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

248 A.D. 731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 731 (Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Licato v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 248 A.D. 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. Although there was a verdict for defendant, it clearly appears defendant offered no proof in contradiction of the claims of plaintiffs. The testimony in support of plaintiffs’ ease seemed to be truthful and convincing. There was nothing suspicious or unusual about the accident and the attendant circumstances. There was ample warrant for the order. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. Although there was a verdict for defendant, it clearly appears defendant offered no proof in contradiction of the claims of plaintiffs. The testimony in support of plaintiffs’ ease seemed to be truthful and convincing. There was nothing suspicious or unusual about the accident and the attendant circumstances. There was ample warrant for the order. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/licato-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1936.