Licari Vs. Perdue

476 P.3d 868

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: December 3, 2020
• Docket: 82039
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LINDSEY LICARI, A/K/A LINDSEY No. 82039 ANTEE, Appellant, vs. LED LINDA PERDUE, A/K/A LINDA NAW; DEC 0 3 2020 AND NAW REAL ESTATE, INC., ELIZA:V:1i 1Â BROWN Res a ondents. CLERK OF 4.iUF.," iME COURT BY EPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for summary judgrnent. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge. The challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because it does not finally resolve all claims asserted in the underlying matter. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). And no other statute or court rule appears to allow an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Gib aons

.41,4G4,0 ,J Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF Nevatut

10) I947A aigniP z_o -c(3ye ifl'e cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Lindsey Licari Shumway Van Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEWOA

101 1947A c411):0 2 -