Licardo v. Licardo
This text of 226 A.D. 706 (Licardo v. Licardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, and judgment directed thereon, with costs, on the ground that the verdict is justified and sustained by the evidence. (Leversee v. Neidermyer, 219 App. Div. 214; Hogan v. Franken, 221 id. 164.) Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hasbrouck, J., dissent on the ground that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/licardo-v-licardo-nyappdiv-1929.