Licardo v. Licardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Licardo v. Licardo

226 A.D. 706

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, and judgment directed thereon, with costs, on the ground that the verdict is justified and sustained by the evidence. (Leversee v. Neidermyer, 219 App. Div. 214; Hogan v. Franken, 221 id. 164.) Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hasbrouck, J., dissent on the ground that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, and judgment directed thereon, with costs, on the ground that the verdict is justified and sustained by the evidence. (Leversee v. Neidermyer, 219 App. Div. 214; Hogan v. Franken, 221 id. 164.) Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hasbrouck, J., dissent on the ground that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial justice.

Licardo v. Licardo, 226 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

226 A.D. 706 (Licardo v. Licardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related