Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Licamele v. Burns, No. Cv89 26 38 56s (Oct. 10, 1991)

Licamele v. Burns, No. Cv89 26 38 56s (Oct. 10, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 9002
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1991
DocketNo. CV89 26 38 56S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 9002 (Licamele v. Burns, No. Cv89 26 38 56s (Oct. 10, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Licamele v. Burns, No. Cv89 26 38 56s (Oct. 10, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 9002 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Re: MOTION TO DISMISS The court has examined paragraphs 12, 13 and 14 of the plaintiff's complaint and finds that a fair reading of those allegations indicates a claim that the actions of the defendant have prevented the plaintiff from making any reasonable use of his property. The complaint adequately alleges a taking of the plaintiff's property rights by the commission of specific acts and the corresponding injury to the plaintiff's property. Because the plaintiff is entitled to his day in court to prove his allegations, the motion to dismiss is denied. Tamm v. Burns, 20 Conn. App. 468, 472.

STODOLINK, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bawza
567 A.2d 1262 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 9002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/licamele-v-burns-no-cv89-26-38-56s-oct-10-1991-connsuperct-1991.