Libutti v. Baylis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Libutti v. Baylis

260 A.D.2d 449, 686 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 449 (Libutti v. Baylis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Libutti v. Baylis, 260 A.D.2d 449, 686 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered February 27, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against her on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

As the plaintiff attempted to cross a street in the middle of the block, she walked into the side of a vehicle driven by the defendant Chris Baylis. Contrary to her contention, the jury verdict in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury’s determination was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and, therefore, should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

[450]*450The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered February 27, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against her on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

As the plaintiff attempted to cross a street in the middle of the block, she walked into the side of a vehicle driven by the defendant Chris Baylis. Contrary to her contention, the jury verdict in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury’s determination was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and, therefore, should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

[450]*450The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 449, 686 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/libutti-v-baylis-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack