Liborio Solis v. Maria Solis

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 2014·No. 04-14-00544-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2014

No. 04-14-00544-CV

Liborio SOLIS, Appellant

v.

Maria SOLIS, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-06368 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal a “Default Order Granting Motion to Rule for Costs” signed on July 14, 2014. Because it appeared that the order was a non- appealable interlocutory order, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Minnfee v. Lexington, No. 04-09-00770-CV, 2010 WL 381367, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Feb. 3, 2010, pet. dism’d) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal of order on motion to rule for costs).

Appellant filed a response in which he requested that we abate the appeal pending the trial court’s compliance with Rule 143 and the issuance of a delinquent dismissal order and that we allow his notice of appeal to become effective on the date of the dismissal order. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 143. Thereafter, we received from the trial court clerk a copy of the trial court’s “Order Setting Aside Default Order Granting Motion to Rule for Costs” signed on August 12, 2014. The order sets aside the July 14, 2014 order granting motion to rule for costs and denies the motion to rule for costs. In light of this order, it appears to the Court that the appeal is moot. See Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2000) (justiciable controversy between the parties must exist at every stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal, or the case is moot); Nat’l 7 Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) (appellate courts are prohibited from deciding moot controversies). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liborio Solis v. Maria Solis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Liborio Solis v. Maria Solis (Liborio Solis v. Maria Solis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Lara
52 S.W.3d 171 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones
1 S.W.3d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)