Liberty Yeast Corp. v. Gottlob.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Liberty Yeast Corp. v. Gottlob.

297 S.W. 592, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 613

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJuly 6, 1927

DocketNo. 9028.

StatusPublished

This text of 297 S.W. 592 (Liberty Yeast Corp. v. Gottlob.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberty Yeast Corp. v. Gottlob., 297 S.W. 592, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 613 (Tex. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, J.

The yeast corporation brought this suit against Gottlob upon an itemized sworn account for $319; he replied *593 through demurrers and denials with defensive pleadings only, asking for no affirmative relief; when the cause was called for trial, neither the plaintiff nor its attorney appeared, but the defendant and his attorney did, and announced ready for trial, whereupon the court, after hearing evidence presented by them upon the merits, rendered judgment that plaintiff take nothing by its suit and also pay the costs.

This action was error; as the defendant below concedes in a written confession filed in this court. The only proper judgment in such circumstances is one dismissing the cause for want of prosecution without prejudice. Parr v. Chittim (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 1079. The trial court’s judgment will therefore be reversed, and this court’s order will enter so decreeing.

Neither can the motion of defendant in error for the taxation of costs against plaintiff in error, which has been taken and considered with the case, be sustained, it not appearing that his attorneys agreed to join opposing counsel in asking the trial court to set aside its erroneous judgment prior to the attaching of this court’s jurisdiction. We therefore conclude that the usual rule as to costs should apply; Waggoner v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App.) 261 S. W. 482; Threatt v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 156 S. W. 1137.

Trial court’s judgment rendered, and cause dismissed as for lack of prosecution, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, J.

The yeast corporation brought this suit against Gottlob upon an itemized sworn account for $319; he replied *593 through demurrers and denials with defensive pleadings only, asking for no affirmative relief; when the cause was called for trial, neither the plaintiff nor its attorney appeared, but the defendant and his attorney did, and announced ready for trial, whereupon the court, after hearing evidence presented by them upon the merits, rendered judgment that plaintiff take nothing by its suit and also pay the costs.

This action was error; as the defendant below concedes in a written confession filed in this court. The only proper judgment in such circumstances is one dismissing the cause for want of prosecution without prejudice. Parr v. Chittim (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 1079. The trial court’s judgment will therefore be reversed, and this court’s order will enter so decreeing.

Neither can the motion of defendant in error for the taxation of costs against plaintiff in error, which has been taken and considered with the case, be sustained, it not appearing that his attorneys agreed to join opposing counsel in asking the trial court to set aside its erroneous judgment prior to the attaching of this court’s jurisdiction. We therefore conclude that the usual rule as to costs should apply; Waggoner v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App.) 261 S. W. 482; Threatt v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 156 S. W. 1137.

Trial court’s judgment rendered, and cause dismissed as for lack of prosecution, without prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 S.W. 592, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-yeast-corp-v-gottlob-texapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack