Liberty v. Champion-International Co.
This text of 175 F. 780 (Liberty v. Champion-International Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the record as a whole, and of the file wrapper in particular, has convinced us that the learned judge of the Circuit Court was right in his “opinion that the defendant is correct in its contention that the claim should be read in the actual sense of its terms, and is limited to a machine employing a plurality of hoppers, and that the defendant has not infringed, since it has used only a single hopper and not a double feed.”
The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers its costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 F. 780, 99 C.C.A. 352, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-v-champion-international-co-ca1-1910.