LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC. v. Joyner

8 So. 3d 380, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1291, 2009 WL 400393
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 2009
Docket1D08-0112
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 So. 3d 380 (LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC. v. Joyner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC. v. Joyner, 8 So. 3d 380, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1291, 2009 WL 400393 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

AFFIRMED. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037, 1044 (Fla.2005) (Pariente, C.J., concurring) (“[Wjhere the liability of one defendant is based on vicarious liability and the issue of vicarious liability is undisputed, apportionment of the offer between the active tortfeasor and the vicarious tortfeasor is problematic because the liability of both defendants is not apportioned but is coextensive.... No matter how clever a defendant or plaintiff might be in attempting to frame an offer, the reality is that there is no rational method to apportion fault.”).

KAHN and BENTON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
68 So. 3d 211 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 So. 3d 380, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1291, 2009 WL 400393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-trucking-inc-v-joyner-fladistctapp-2009.