LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC. v. Joyner
This text of 8 So. 3d 380 (LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC. v. Joyner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037, 1044 (Fla.2005) (Pariente, C.J., concurring) (“[Wjhere the liability of one defendant is based on vicarious liability and the issue of vicarious liability is undisputed, apportionment of the offer between the active tortfeasor and the vicarious tortfeasor is problematic because the liability of both defendants is not apportioned but is coextensive.... No matter how clever a defendant or plaintiff might be in attempting to frame an offer, the reality is that there is no rational method to apportion fault.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 So. 3d 380, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1291, 2009 WL 400393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-trucking-inc-v-joyner-fladistctapp-2009.