Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Nemecek

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Nemecek

816 P.2d 663, 108 Or. App. 490, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1241

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 21, 1991

DocketWCB 89-00148; CA A67402

StatusPublished

This text of 816 P.2d 663 (Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Nemecek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Nemecek, 816 P.2d 663, 108 Or. App. 490, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1241 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming and adopting the referee’s order, which concluded that claimant’s occupational disease claim was compensable, because her work was a material contributing cause of the condition. Employer asserts that the Board relied on an erroneous interpretation of ORS 656.802. Employer is correct. We recently decided that the 1987 legislature did not intend to change the major contributing cause standard. Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494, 812 P2d 844 (1991).

Although the referee’s opinion suggested that one of the four doctors’ reports would support a finding that claimant’s work was the major contributing cause of her condition, and we think the record contains substantial evidence to support such a finding, neither the referee nor the Board made that finding. Rather, the referee concluded that “all of the medical opinions in the record establish at the very least that claimant’s work was a material contributing cause.” (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, we must reverse and remand for reconsideration of whether claimant’s work was the major contributing cause of her condition. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Damm, 107 Or App 764, 812 P2d 854 (1991).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming and adopting the referee’s order, which concluded that claimant’s occupational disease claim was compensable, because her work was a material contributing cause of the condition. Employer asserts that the Board relied on an erroneous interpretation of ORS 656.802. Employer is correct. We recently decided that the 1987 legislature did not intend to change the major contributing cause standard. Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494, 812 P2d 844 (1991).

Although the referee’s opinion suggested that one of the four doctors’ reports would support a finding that claimant’s work was the major contributing cause of her condition, and we think the record contains substantial evidence to support such a finding, neither the referee nor the Board made that finding. Rather, the referee concluded that “all of the medical opinions in the record establish at the very least that claimant’s work was a material contributing cause.” (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, we must reverse and remand for reconsideration of whether claimant’s work was the major contributing cause of her condition. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Damm, 107 Or App 764, 812 P2d 854 (1991).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 P.2d 663, 108 Or. App. 490, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-northwest-insurance-v-nemecek-orctapp-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack