Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier

154 So. 116, 26 Ala. App. 75, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 227
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 1933·No. 8 Div. 739.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Parties have a right to frame the issues as suits them both.

In this case, as the issues were framed, as we understand them, they were properly submitted to the jury, whose verdict is amply supported.

The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence we assume such a condition of same as to justify each ruling, none of same being inherently and incurably erroneous, to which exception was reserved.

For the same reason we will not review the giving or refusing of written charges.

No prejudicial error having been pointed out, etc., to us, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SAMFORD, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier, 154 So. 116, 26 Ala. App. 75, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 227 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

154 So. 116 (Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jones
17 So. 2d 883 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Powell v. Bingham
196 So. 154 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)
Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier
154 So. 119 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)