Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier
This text of 154 So. 116 (Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Parties have a right to frame the issues as suits them both.
In this case, as the issues were framed, as we understand them, they were properly submitted to the jury, whose verdict is amply supported.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence we assume such a condition of same as to justify each ruling, none of same being inherently and incurably erroneous, to which exception was reserved.
For the same reason we will not review the giving or refusing of written charges.
No prejudicial error having been pointed out, etc., to us, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
SAMFORD, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 So. 116, 26 Ala. App. 75, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-nat-life-ins-co-v-collier-alactapp-1933.