Home/New York Court of Appeals/Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

453 N.E.2d 1254, 59 N.Y.2d 1021, 466 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3284
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County (85 AD2d 410) is not apposite.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, 453 N.E.2d 1254, 59 N.Y.2d 1021, 466 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3284 (N.Y. 1983).

453 N.E.2d 1254 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
59 N.Y.2d 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)