Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
This text of 453 N.E.2d 1254 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County (85 AD2d 410) is not apposite.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 N.E.2d 1254, 59 N.Y.2d 1021, 466 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-prudential-property-casualty-insurance-ny-1983.