Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom

304 So. 2d 486
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom. Read the opinion of the Court — 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 9017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1974·No. No. 72-569·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted a new trial to defendants because of jury taint, as detailed by the trial court in the appealed order.

There has been no clear showing that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959). We have considered the action in light of the criteria found in Florida Power Corporation v. Smith, 202 So.2d 872 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1967), and are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and KIRKLAND, THOMAS, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom, 304 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

304 So. 2d 486 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power Corporation v. Smith
202 So. 2d 872 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)