Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom

297 So. 2d 2, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3692
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 19, 1974·No. No. 44627·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

By petition for certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Nystrom, 283 So.2d 164) which allegedly conflicts with a prior deci[3]*3sion of this Court (Marley v. Saunders, 249 So.2d 30) on the same point of law. We have jurisdiction. Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b) (3), F.S.A.

We have dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F.A.R., 32 F.S. A., and on authority of our decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 297 So.2d 1, opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and OVERTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom, 297 So. 2d 2, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3692 (Fla. 1974).

297 So. 2d 2 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nystrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. Division of Administration
303 So. 2d 328 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)