Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Haygood
This text of 59 S.E.2d 731 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Haygood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While it is true that findings of fact, made by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, are,' in the absence of fraud, conclusive upon the courts where there is any evidence to support them, nevertheless, construing the testimony as a whole adduced upon the hearing of this workmen’s compensation case before the director, and upon which evidence the full board based its findings and award, the finding that the claimant was only partially dependent upon the deceased was demanded, as a matter of law, and the award of the full board based on total dependency was not authorized, and the superior court erred in not remanding the case to the board in order that findings and an award based on such partial dependency and under the formula provided in the Code, Ann. Supp. i 114-413(c) could be made.,
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 S.E.2d 731, 81 Ga. App. 726, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-haygood-gactapp-1950.