Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Graham

85 A.D.2d 879, 446 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16713

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.2d 879 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Graham, 85 A.D.2d 879, 446 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision at Special Term, Murphy, J. We note, however, that the court’s reference to 11 NYCRR 65.15 was in error since that regulation applies only to accidents occurring on or after December 1, 1977. The applicable regulation is 11 NYCRR 65.6, as extant from July 15, 1974 to November 28,1977. Additionally, since it is unclear in the record when Social Security disability benefits were actually paid to defendant, we note that plaintiff’s complaint sets forth only a cause of action for breach of a contract dated March 26, 1977 and does not assert a cause of action for restitution of any such benefits actually paid to defendant prior to the date of the contract. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court, Murphy, J. — dismiss complaint, interrogatories.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision at Special Term, Murphy, J. We note, however, that the court’s reference to 11 NYCRR 65.15 was in error since that regulation applies only to accidents occurring on or after December 1, 1977. The applicable regulation is 11 NYCRR 65.6, as extant from July 15, 1974 to November 28,1977. Additionally, since it is unclear in the record when Social Security disability benefits were actually paid to defendant, we note that plaintiff’s complaint sets forth only a cause of action for breach of a contract dated March 26, 1977 and does not assert a cause of action for restitution of any such benefits actually paid to defendant prior to the date of the contract. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court, Murphy, J. — dismiss complaint, interrogatories.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.2d 879, 446 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-graham-nyappdiv-1981.