Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Fourth Circuit

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

593 F. App'x 257

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2015·No. No. 14-1549·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Rife & Hall Coal Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of living miner benefits to former employee Greley Justus and survivor’s benefits to Justus’ surviving spouse, Carolyn Justus, under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that' the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, Nos. 13-0313-BLA & 13-0314-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Rife & Hall Coal Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of living miner benefits to former employee Greley Justus and survivor’s benefits to Justus’ surviving spouse, Carolyn Justus, under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that' the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, Nos. 13-0313-BLA & 13-0314-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 593 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

593 F. App'x 257 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related